State Ex Rel. Fares v. Karger
Indiana Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtGilkison, J.
This action is an information in the nature of quo warranto by relator.
The information is at issue by an answer in two paragraphs, the second being affirmative. The reply to the second paragraph admits the averments contained therein.
There was a stipulation of facts, the substance of which is that the relator and the appellee had each duly and timely qualified as township trustee of the township as provided by law.
The admitted averments of the petition, the admitted averments of the second paragraph of answer and the stipulation of facts, constitute all the facts before the court below.
These…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- State ex rel. Carson v. HarrisonIndiana Supreme Court · 1888
- State ex rel. Leal v. JonesIndiana Supreme Court · 1862
- Gosman v. State ex rel. SchumacherIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
- State ex rel. Jackson Township v. BergIndiana Supreme Court · 1875
- Relender v. State ex rel. UtzIndiana Supreme Court · 1898
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Smith v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2001
- Stoffel v. DanielsIndiana Court of Appeals · 2009
- State Ex Rel. O'Hara v. ApplingOregon Supreme Court · 1959
- State ex rel. Olsen v. SwanbergMontana Supreme Court · 1956
- State Ex Rel. Denton v. KinkleIndiana Supreme Court · 1949
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.