Gramercy North Associates v. Biderman
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Ross, J.
The issue on this appeal is whether the determination of the Department of Housing Preservation and Development of the City of New York, denying the application of Gramercy North Associates, for partial tax exemption benefits, pursuant to Real Property Tax Law § 421-a, was arbitrary and capricious.
In order "to spur new construction of multiple dwellings to meet a housing shortage afflicting * * * municipalities * * * [throughout the State of New York]” (Matter of Trump-Equitable Fifth Ave. Co. v Gliedman, 62 NY2d 539, 543 [1984]), in 1971, Real Property Tax Law…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Trump-Equitable Fifth Avenue Co. v. GliedmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
- Grossman v. RankinNew York Court of Appeals · 1977
- In re Sigety v. IngrahamNew York Court of Appeals · 1971
- Trump-Equitable Fifth Avenue Co. v. GliedmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
- Appelbaum v. DeutschNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Poster v. StroughAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
- State v. Fashion Place AssociatesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
- H & A Realty Co. v. Town of IslipAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
- City of Burlington v. City of South BurlingtonVermont Superior Court · 2016
- DeNicola v. DiamanteAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.