Legal Opinion
Brighton v. Department of Transportation
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided December 3, 2001No. 47076-1-IPublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBaker, J.
— Edward E. Brighton, Jr., appeals a Finding and Order of the Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT). The Finding and Order concluded that the construction of a limited access freeway abutting Brighton’s property satisfied local community plans and that no environmental impact statement (EIS) was required for construction of the limited access freeway sys*858tem. Brighton disputes both of the conclusions in the Finding and Order. We hold that the WSDOT Finding and Order is supported by substantial evidence and affirm.
I
In 1953, a plan to establish State Route 18 (SR18) as a limited…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Tapper v. Employment Security DepartmentWashington Supreme Court · 1993
- City of Redmond v. Central Puget Sound Growth Management Hearings BoardWashington Supreme Court · 1998
- McDaniels v. CarlsonWashington Supreme Court · 1987
- Nielson v. Spanaway General Medical ClinicWashington Supreme Court · 1998
- Nielson v. Spanaway General Medical Clinic, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1998
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Bullseye Distributing, L.L.C. v. Gambling CommissionCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2005
- Bullseye Distributing, LLC v. State, Gambling Com'nCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2005
- Brighton v. STATE DEPT. OF TRANSP.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2001
- Ryan v. Department of Social & Health ServicesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2012
- Darkenwald v. Employment Security DepartmentCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2014
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.