Legal Opinion

State v. Harrop

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided March 20, 2019No. A164452PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtArmstrong, P. J.

*543The state appeals an order granting defendant's motion to suppress evidence. It contends that the trial court erred in concluding that the arresting police officer lacked probable cause to believe that defendant had impeded traffic in violation of ORS 811.130 when the officer stopped defendant. The court's conclusion on that point formed the basis of its decision to grant defendant's suppression motion. We conclude that the facts as the officer perceived them did give rise to a reasonable belief by the officer that defendant had violated ORS 811.130. Hence, we reverse and remand.

On review of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. TiffinCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2005
  2. State v. IsleyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2002
  3. State v. CarsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2017

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. SevitsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2024
  2. State v. SevitsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API