Legal Opinion

State v. Hogan

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided August 1, 2025No. 126442Published

1Opinion of the Court

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS No. 126,442 STATE OF KANSAS, Appellee, v. KALEB P.R. HOGAN, Appellant. SYLLABUS BY THE COURT 1. Under K.S.A. 60-407(f), courts may allow use of all relevant evidence, which is evidence having any tendency in reason to prove any material fact. Relevance has two components: materiality and probative value. A material fact has some real bearing on a decision in the case, and probative evidence tends to prove any material fact. 2. The party attempting to admit evidence carries the burden to establish a foundation. 3. Upon a proper objection based on an…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Huddleston v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  3. United States v. Orange Jell BeechumCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978
  4. State v. WardSupreme Court of Kansas · 2011
  5. State v. McGinnisWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1994

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API