Legal Opinion

State v. Hartzell

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided July 19, 2010No. 63816-5-IPublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBecker, J.

¶1 Charles Hartzell and Jeremy Tieskotter were convicted of armed assault and unlawful possession of a firearm for shooting into an apartment occupied by a woman and her daughter. Investigators were able to link Hartzell and Tieskotter to the crime by establishing that the guns they possessed in two separate incidents were the same guns used to shoot into the apartment. Upon review of their assignments of error, we conclude that the evidence of the two separate incidents was properly admitted under ER 404(b); the trial court’s limiting instruction was not a comment on the evidence; and…

2Cases cited39 opinions

  1. Neder v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  2. Harris v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. State v. YoungWashington Supreme Court · 1994
  4. State v. MyrickWashington Supreme Court · 1984
  5. State v. SeagullWashington Supreme Court · 1981

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. State v. MechamWashington Supreme Court · 2016
  2. State v. HartzellCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2010
  3. State v. HartzellCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2009
  4. People v. McKnightSupreme Court of Colorado · 2019
  5. Quang Nguyen v. Port Of Seattle Police Department, Resp., Et Ano.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2015

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API