Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

People v. Enright

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 13, 1934No. Crim. No. 1342PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPullen, P. J.

Appellants were indicted for rape and from a judgment based upon a verdict of guilty they prosecute this appeal.

*650Inasmuch as it is not contended that the evidence is insufficient to support the verdict we need not set forth the evidence in any detail except as it is necessary to make clear the point urged for reversal.

The complaining witness had, in company with several of her companions, visited a resort in a little town not far from Sacramento. At the same place were gathered some of the.local hoodlums of the neighborhood. Apparently the complaining witness did not like the looks of those…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. People v. CastroCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
  2. Matter of Application of KantrowitzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1914
  3. People v. FontanaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
  4. People v. MacChiaroliCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. FarrellMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1948
  2. People v. MotaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1981
  3. People v. MaddenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1981
  4. People v. LawrenceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
  5. People v. RuizCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API