Legal Opinion

Cervac v. Littman (In re Littman)

United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided September 11, 2014No. Bankruptcy No. 11bk38875; Adversary No. 12ap00155PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM DECISION

TIMOTHY A. BARNES, Bankruptcy Judge.

The matter before the court is the Second Motion to Vacate Judgment and for Leave to File Response to Cervac’s Summary Judgment Motion (the “Motion to Vacate ”) brought by debtor Kimberly A. Littman (the “Debtor ”) seeking relief from the court’s Order Granting Plaintiffs Motion for Summary Judgment (the “Order Granting Motion”) and Rule 7058 Judgment Order (the “Judgment Order” and collectively with the Order Granting Motion, the “Orders ”) under Rules 59 and 60 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure *851(the “Civil Rules”) on the grounds…

2Cases cited55 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  3. District of Columbia Court of Appeals v. FeldmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. Rooker v. Fidelity Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
  5. Hertz Corp. v. FriendSupreme Court of the United States · 2010

50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Cervac v. Littman (In re Littman)District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2015
  2. R & J Construction Supply Co. v. Juma (In re Juma)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 2015
  3. Cervac v. Littman (In re Littman)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API