Legal Opinion

Glynn v. Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp.

District Court, D. New Jersey

Decided June 27, 2013No. Civil Action Nos. 11-5304, 08-08PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

PISANO, District Judge.

Plaintiffs Bernadette Glynn and Richard Glynn (“Plaintiffs”) brought this lawsuit against Defendant Merck, Sharp, & Dohme Corp. (“Defendant”), the manufacturer of Fosamax, which is a drug approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration (“FDA”) for the treatment and prevention of osteoporosis. This matter is part of the multi-district litigation (“MDL”) concerning Fosamax and involves allegations that Fosamax causes atypical femur fractures (“AFFs1”), it caused Plaintiff Mrs. Glynn’s femur fracture, and Defendant failed to warn physicians about Fosamax…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Fidelity Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. De La CuestaSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Hillsborough County v. Automated Medical Laboratories, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Wyeth v. LevineSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  4. Sprietsma v. Mercury MarineSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  5. Farina v. Nokia, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2010

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Reckis v. Johnson & JohnsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2015
  2. In Re Fosamax (Alendronate Sodium) Products Liability LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2017
  3. Rheinfrank v. Abbott Laboratories, Inc.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2015
  4. D.W.K. v. Abbott Laboratories, Inc.District Court, S.D. Illinois · 2015
  5. In re Incretin-Based Therapies Products Liability LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2015

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API