Legal Opinion

Ex Parte Bentley

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided April 7, 1954No. 290PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJohnson, J.

In re Smith, 235 N.C. 169, 69 S.E. 2d 174, is decisive of this case. The rule is that two sentences, in the absence of a directive as to time of commencement, in order to run concurrently, must be sentences to the same place of confinement. Sentences to different institutions, in the very nature of things, are consecutive and not concurrent. In re Smith, supra.

The decision in In re Parker, 225 N.C. 369, 35 S.E. 2d 169, which no doubt influenced the court below in releasing the defendant, is distinguishable. There, the sentences were to be served at the same prison. Here, the defendant was…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In Re ParkerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1945
  2. State v. SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. StonestreetSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
  2. In Re SwinkSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
  3. People ex rel. Sanchez v. ZelkerNew York Supreme Court · 1971
  4. People ex rel. Pettaway v. ZelkerNew York Supreme Court · 1971
  5. State v. BrooksSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API