Legal Opinion

Williams-Moore v. Estate of Shaw

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided August 16, 2004No. Nos. 51701-5-I; 51702-3-IPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSchindler, J.

The trial court ruled that Brenda Williams-Moore (Williams-Moore) was qualified to act as the personal representative of the Estate of James Shaw (the Estate) and accept service of process in her personal injury lawsuit against the Estate even though she did not file the court-ordered bond or the oath of personal representative before accepting service. The trial court certified its order involved a controlling question of law. We accepted discretionary review and conclude that when Williams-Moore accepted service, she was not qualified to act as the personal representative because she had…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Berger v. SonnelandWashington Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Berger v. SonnelandWashington Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Beal v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Beal for Martinez v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  5. State v. DuvallCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1997

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Williams-Moore v. Estate of ShawCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2004
  2. Roberto v. LoanDepot.com LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Washington · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API