Legal Opinion
In Re Flor
United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Connecticut
Decided May 3, 1994No. 15-30368PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OF DECISION AND ORDER RE: CONFIRMATION OF PLAN
ROBERT L. KRECHEVSKY, Chief Judge.
I
ISSUE
The dispositive issue in this proceeding is whether a court may confirm a debtors’ joint Chapter 11 plan whose feasibility concededly relies upon the receipt of the debtors’ future wages for a period of at least seven years. The debtors, who are husband and wife, contend that “present law is totally permissive of such a confirmation.” Debtors’ Brief at 1. The court, notwithstanding apparent plan acceptance by all impaired classes, concludes fundamental bankruptcy principles embodied in Chapter 11…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Local Loan Co. v. HuntSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Norwest Bank Worthington v. AhlersSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Toibb v. RadloffSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- In Re Edward R. Fitzsimmons, Debtor. Edward R. Fitzsimmons v. Edward M. Walsh, Trustee, and Official Creditors' CommitteeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
- In Re LennonUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Georgia · 1986
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Smoker v. Hill & Associates, Inc.District Court, N.D. Indiana · 1997
- In Re BullardUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Connecticut · 2007
- In Re HasanUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Connecticut · 2002
- In Re RumkerUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Georgia · 1995
- Roland v. UNUM Life Insurance Co. of AmericaDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1998
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.