City of Detroit v. Robinson
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to tbe Superior Court of Detroit. Assumpsit. The facts are in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtMarston, J.
Robinson and Farwell brought an action of assumpsit against the city of Detroit to recover a balance which they claimed was due and owing them on account of materials furnished and work and labor done in paving a portion of Woodward avenue in said city.
It appeared from the testimony of Farwell, one of the plaintiffs, and was not disputed, that the materials were furnished and work and labor performed under a contract made between the city and Eobinson in 1875 and afterwards assigned to a -copartnership composed of plaintiffs. It farther appeared that the entire work and labor done and…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- City of Detroit v. Michigan Paving Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1877
3Cited by11 opinions
- Johnson County Savings Bank v. City of CrestonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1930
- City of Indianapolis v. WannIndiana Supreme Court · 1896
- Niles Water Works v. Mayor of NilesMichigan Supreme Court · 1886
- McCurdy v. County of ShiawasseeMichigan Supreme Court · 1908
- Lasky v. City of Bad AxeMichigan Supreme Court · 1958
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.