Legal Opinion

Scott v. United States

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided May 10, 1989No. 85-206, 86-423Published

1Opinion of the Court

559 A.2d 745 (1989)

Monroe W. SCOTT, Jr., Appellant,

v.

UNITED STATES, Appellee.

Nos. 85-206, 86-423.

District of Columbia Court of Appeals.

Argued October 3, 1988.

Decided May 10, 1989.

James Klein, Public Defender Service, with whom Maureen T. Cannon and Jennifer P. Lyman, Public Defender Service, Washington, D.C., were on the brief, for appellant.

Saul M. Pilchen, Asst. U.S. Atty., with whom Joseph E. diGenova, U.S. Atty., at the time the brief was filed, and Michael W. Farrell and Zinora M. Mitchell, Asst. U.S. Attys., Washington, D.C., were on the brief, for appellee.

Before ROGERS,[*] Chief…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited46 opinions

  1. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Kotteakos v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  3. Sheppard v. MaxwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  4. Tumey v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
  5. Rose v. ClarkSupreme Court of the United States · 1986

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API