Legal Opinion
CNET Networks, Inc. v. Etilize, Inc.
District Court, N.D. California
Decided October 22, 2008No. C 06-5378 MHPPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM & ORDER
MARILYN HALL PATEL, District Judge.
Plaintiff CNET Networks, Inc. (“CNET”) filed this action against defendant Etilize, Inc. (“Etilize”), alleging infringement of United States Patent No. 6,714,933 (“the '933 patent”) and its continuation-in-part, United States Patent No. 7,082,426 (“the '426 patent”) (together, “the patents-in-suit”). These patents generally relate to methods and processes of compiling information about consumer products into catalogued databases for online merchants. The court recently ruled on Etilize’s motion for summary judgment on non-infringement,…
2Cases cited51 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- First Nat. Bank of Ariz. v. Cities Service Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Singleton v. WulffSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- MARKMAN Et Al. v. WESTVIEW INSTRUMENTS, INC., Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- CBS Interactive, Inc. v. Etilize, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2009
- Duhn Oil Tool, Inc. v. Cooper Cameron Corp.District Court, E.D. California · 2011
- Delano Farms Co. v. California Table Grape CommissionDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2013
- Shuffle Tech International LLC v. Scientific Games CorporationDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2018