United Ass'n of Journeymen & Apprentices of the Plumbing & Pipe Fitting Industry of the United States & Canada v. Borden
Texas Supreme Court
1ConcurrenceJustice Smith
In concurring with the majority opinion, I feel constrained to set down my views relative to the improper action of the trial court in sustaining petitioners’ plea in abatement and dismissing respondent’s cause of action. The writ in the present case was granted because of the tentative view that the case of Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen v. Allen, Texas Civ. App., 230 S.W. 2d 325, wr. ref. cert. den. 340 U.S. 934, 71 S. Ct. 501, rehearing denied 341 U.S. 906, 71 S. Ct. 611, was controlling and required a dismissal of Borden’s suit. I do not agree with petitioners that the Allen case is…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Williams v. WileyTexas Supreme Court · 1902
- Dingwall v. Amalgamated Ass'n of Street Railway Employees of AmericaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1906
- Grogan Manufacturing Co. v. LaneTexas Supreme Court · 1943
- Taxicab Drivers' Local Union No. 889 v. PittmanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1957
- Koogler v. KooglerOhio Supreme Court · 1933
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.