Ex Parte Goodwyn
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the CourtBrown, Justice
(after stating the facts as above).
The petitioner rests his right to the issuance of the writ of prohibition on the alleged fact that he is a receiver, by appointment of the circuit court of Montgomery county, of all the assets of the National Surety Com paay, and that the subsequent appointment of receivers by the circuit court of Jefferson county is an unwarranted interference with his constructive possession of the property, and an abuse of its jurisdiction by the Jefferson county circuit court.
The respondent, on the other hand, asserts that the petitioner is not a receiver, that the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Gay, Hardie & Co. v. Brierfield Coal & Iron Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1891
- Ex parte WalkerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1854
- Scott v. WareSupreme Court of Alabama · 1880
- Alabama National Bank v. Mary Lee Coal & Railway Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1895
- Strother v. McCordSupreme Court of Alabama · 1931
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Ex Parte BurchSupreme Court of Alabama · 1938
- C. E. Development Company v. KitchensSupreme Court of Alabama · 1972
- American Armed Services Underwriters, Inc. v. Atlas InsuranceSupreme Court of Alabama · 1958
- Fidelity Deposit Co. of Maryland v. GoodwynSupreme Court of Alabama · 1935
- Hometrust Life Insurance Company v. United States Fidelity and Guaranty Company and National Surety CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1962
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.