Andrie Inc v. Department of Treasury
Michigan Supreme Court
1DissentZahra, J.
This case is about whether and when the Department of Treasury must afford consumers a rebuttable presumption that no use tax is due. The majority believes that consumers need only be afforded such a presumption when those consumers can prove either that the retailer actually remitted sales tax to the state or that the consumer paid to the retailer the value of the sales tax (an amount equal to the tax imposed on the retailer pursuant to MCL 205.52(1)). I disagree. MCL 205.52(1) only places the burden of paying sales tax on retailers; it does not impose a sales tax on consumers. In light of…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Sun Valley Foods Co. v. WardMichigan Supreme Court · 1999
- Mayor of Lansing v. Public Service CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 2004
- Bradley v. Saranac Community Schools Board of EducationMichigan Supreme Court · 1997
- People v. GoldstonMichigan Supreme Court · 2004
- People v. ThompsonMichigan Supreme Court · 2007
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.