Legal Opinion

Matter of Pulliam

United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Missouri

Decided April 17, 1987No. 17-41621PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER DIRECTING FELDHAUSEN, BURKE AND PETTY, P.C. TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THEIR AD INTERIM FEE APPLICATION SHOULD NOT BE DENIED

DENNIS J. STEWART, Chief Judge.

On December 81, 1985, the law firm of Feldhausen, Burke and Petty, P.C., filed its application for an ad interim award of attorney’s fees and reimbursement of expenses in the total sum of $10,709.65. A hearing was, on notice to the interested creditors, held on the application on February 27, 1986, in St. Joseph, Missouri, whereupon it developed that the debtors had made significant prepetition payments of attorney’s fees (said to be in the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. In Re RobertsUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Utah · 1985
  2. In Re Chapel Gate Apartments, Ltd.United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Texas · 1986
  3. Ramsey v. RamseyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
  4. In Re Heatron, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Missouri · 1980
  5. In Re Anver Corp.United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Massachusetts · 1984

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In Re Creative Restaurant Management, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Missouri · 1992
  2. Yellow Cab Cooperative Ass'n v. Mathis (In Re Yellow Cab Cooperative Ass'n)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Colorado · 1995
  3. Enelia Falu Garcia v. R-G Financial Corporation, et al.United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API