Securities & Exchange Commission v. Waterhouse
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
LEVAL, Circuit Judge:
When the government of the United States engages in litigation against other parties and takes positions that are not “substantially justified,” the prevailing adversary is entitled under the Equal Access to Justice Act (“EAJA”), 28 U.S.C.A. § 2412, (West 1994) to be compensated by the Government for “fees and other expenses” incurred in the litigation. This appeal raises various questions regarding the rights created by this *807statute, especially as it applies to a 'pro se litigant.
After the dismissal of the Securities and Exchange Commission’s action against Rich-ard…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- West Virginia University Hospitals, Inc. v. CaseySupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Kay v. EhrlerSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Independent Federation of Flight Attendants v. ZipesSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Merrell v. BlockCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- Ortiz v. ReganCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1992
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Securities And Exchange Commission v. Price WaterhouseCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994