Legal Opinion · Dissent

People v. Dunbar

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided April 3, 2001No. Docket 116976Published

1DissentKelly, J.

I would affirm the decisions of both the Court of Appeals and the circuit court. The prosecution’s initiation of a second preliminary examination, without introducing new evidence, violated defendant’s due process right to a fair proceeding.

A

The prosecution brings an issue of first impression to this Court, although the Court of Appeals has addressed it several times.1 The prosecution filed a criminal action against defendant Dunbar a second *619time with no new evidence after having obtained dismissal of an identical action during the preliminary examination. When presented with a similar…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. People v. VargoMichigan Court of Appeals · 1984
  2. People v. GeorgeMichigan Court of Appeals · 1982
  3. People v. WallsMichigan Court of Appeals · 1982
  4. People v. StaffordMichigan Court of Appeals · 1988
  5. People v. TurmonMichigan Court of Appeals · 1983

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API