People v. Dunbar
Michigan Supreme Court
1DissentKelly, J.
I would affirm the decisions of both the Court of Appeals and the circuit court. The prosecution’s initiation of a second preliminary examination, without introducing new evidence, violated defendant’s due process right to a fair proceeding.
A
The prosecution brings an issue of first impression to this Court, although the Court of Appeals has addressed it several times.1 The prosecution filed a criminal action against defendant Dunbar a second *619time with no new evidence after having obtained dismissal of an identical action during the preliminary examination. When presented with a similar…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- People v. VargoMichigan Court of Appeals · 1984
- People v. GeorgeMichigan Court of Appeals · 1982
- People v. WallsMichigan Court of Appeals · 1982
- People v. StaffordMichigan Court of Appeals · 1988
- People v. TurmonMichigan Court of Appeals · 1983
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.