Legal Opinion
State v. Sacco
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided May 10, 1990PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
242 N.J. Super. 699 (1990)
577 A.2d 1333
STATE OF NEW YORK AND THOMAS C. JORLING, ET AL., PLAINTIFFS,
v.
FRANK SACCO, LILLIAN SACCO, MATERIAL TRANSPORT SERVICE AND DART CORPORATION, DEFENDANTS.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division Bergen County.
Decided May 10, 1990.
Joseph R. Fischer, for plaintiffs (Clemente, Strenk & Kiernan, attorneys).
Alan Liebowitz, for defendants (Liebowitz & Liebowitz, attorneys).
LAWRENCE D. SMITH, J.S.C.
The essential issue addressed in this opinion is whether the "penal exception" to the Full Faith and Credit Clause of the United States Constitution precludes…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Huntington v. AttrillSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Loucks v. . Standard Oil Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1918
- Wisconsin v. Pelican InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
- Magnolia Petroleum Co. v. HuntSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Milwaukee County v. M. E. White Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1935
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Silverman v. BerksonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1995
- Republic of the Philippines v. Westinghouse Electric Corp.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1993