Legal Opinion
Richard Russo v. Trifari, Krussman & Fishel, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided January 8, 1988No. 257, Docket 87-7517PublishedCited by 48 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WINTER, Circuit Judge:
Richard Russo appeals from the dismissal of his action brought under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (“ADEA”), 29 U.S.C. §§ 621-634 (1982).
Upon the close of discovery, defendant Trifari, Krussman & Fishel, Inc. (“Trifari”) moved for dismissal of Russo’s complaint and alternatively for summary judgment. In granting Trifari’s motions, Judge Goet-tel held that the complaint did not allege facts sufficient to state a claim under the ADEA’s statute of limitations provision for willful violations, and that the ADEA’s two-year statute of limitations for non-willful…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Delaware State College v. RicksSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Trans World Airlines, Inc. v. ThurstonSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by48 opinions
- McLaughlin v. Richland Shoe Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Joseph E. Dister v. The Continental Group, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1988
- Albert v. CarovanoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1988
- Donald Binder v. Long Island Lighting CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1991
- Thomas Taggart v. Time IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1991
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.