Gustafson v. Warner-Lambert Co.
District Court, M.D. Florida
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER ON DEFENDANT WARNER-LAMBERT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND PLAINTIFF GUSTAFSON’S MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT
KOVACHEVICH, District Judge.
THIS CAUSE is before the Court on the Motion for Partial Summary Judgment filed by Plaintiff Albert F.’ Gustafson (“Gustafson”) and Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Defendant Warner-Lambert Company (“Warner-Lambert”).
This circuit clearly holds that a summary judgment should only be entered when the moving party has sustained its burden of showing the absence of a genuine issue as to any material fact when all the evidence is viewed in the…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Eastman Kodak Co. v. Image Technical Services, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Universal Minerals, Inc. v. C. A. Hughes & Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1981
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.