Legal Opinion

Roy Lee Barrett, Jackie Hamilton Gainey and Cleveland Johns v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided September 5, 1963No. 19574PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WISDOM, Circuit Judge.

The defendants-appellants raise an important issue — the constitutionality of the statutory presumptions which Section 5601(b), Title 26 U.S.C.A. establishes. These are presumptions of a defendant’s possession of a still and of carrying on the business of a distiller on a showing of the defendant’s unexplained presence at the site of an unregistered still. Reluctantly, because of a proper respect for Acts of Congress and because of the special competency of the legislature generally to establish rules of evidence and procedure, 1 we feel compelled to hold that these…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Tot v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  2. Wilson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  3. Bozza v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  4. Mobile, Jackson & Kansas City Railroad v. TurnipseedSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
  5. Morrison v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1934

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. United States v. RomanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  2. State v. HansenSupreme Court of Iowa · 1972
  3. United States v. Frank Romano, John Ottiano, Edward Romano and Antonio VellucciCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1964
  4. Fred Rose Morales v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1965
  5. Owens v. RobertsDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 1974

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API