Roy Lee Barrett, Jackie Hamilton Gainey and Cleveland Johns v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
WISDOM, Circuit Judge.
The defendants-appellants raise an important issue — the constitutionality of the statutory presumptions which Section 5601(b), Title 26 U.S.C.A. establishes. These are presumptions of a defendant’s possession of a still and of carrying on the business of a distiller on a showing of the defendant’s unexplained presence at the site of an unregistered still. Reluctantly, because of a proper respect for Acts of Congress and because of the special competency of the legislature generally to establish rules of evidence and procedure, 1 we feel compelled to hold that these…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Tot v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Wilson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
- Bozza v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Mobile, Jackson & Kansas City Railroad v. TurnipseedSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
- Morrison v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- United States v. RomanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- State v. HansenSupreme Court of Iowa · 1972
- United States v. Frank Romano, John Ottiano, Edward Romano and Antonio VellucciCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1964
- Fred Rose Morales v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1965
- Owens v. RobertsDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 1974
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.