Legal Opinion
Department of Finance of Sussex County v. Smith
Superior Court of Delaware
Decided October 13, 2022No. S21T-10-019 MHCPublished
1Opinion of the Court
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE OF ) SUSSEX COUNTY, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) CA No. S21T-10-019 MHC ) JERRY SMITH, ) ) Defendant. ) ORDER Submitted: August 11, 2022 Decided: October 13, 2022 Upon Consideration of Motion to Set Aside Sheriff’s Sale, DENIED. Ryan T. Adams, Esq., Moore & Rutt, P.A., Georgetown, Delaware, Attorney for Plaintiff Department of Finance of Sussex County. Jerry L. Smith, Frankford, Delaware, Pro Se. CONNER, J. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND (1) On August 4, 2006, Defendant Jerry Smith (“Defendant”) acquired an interest in 23…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Mennonite Board of Missions v. AdamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Burge v. Fidelity Bond and Mortg. Co.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1994
- Shipley v. New Castle CountySupreme Court of Delaware · 2009
- In re AdairSuperior Court of Delaware · 1936
- Deibler v. Atlantic Properties Group, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1995