Santo v. Santo
Appellate Court of Illinois
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Murray
Defendants Mildred and Cynthia Santo, co-executors of the estate of Sam Santo, deceased, appeal from an order of the circuit court of Cook County granting specific performance of a buy-sell agreement between decedent and his brother, plaintiff Michael Santo. Defendants contend that the agreement was too ambiguous, vague and incomplete to be specifically enforced or, alternatively, that if it is to be enforced, it must be enforced as written and not as allegedly rewritten by the trial court, which supplied terms not contained in the agreement. For the reasons set forth below, we affirm in…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Hux v. RabenIllinois Supreme Court · 1967
- Borg-Warner Corp. v. Anchor Coupling Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1958
- Inland Real Estate Corp. v. ChristophAppellate Court of Illinois · 1981
- Chicago Investment Corp. v. DolinsAppellate Court of Illinois · 1981
- Kendall v. KendallIllinois Supreme Court · 1978
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Kane v. McDermottAppellate Court of Illinois · 1989
- Fried v. BaradAppellate Court of Illinois · 1988
- Ocean Atlantic Development Corp. v. Aurora Christian Schools, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2003
- Landers v. Andrews FronczekAppellate Court of Illinois · 1988
- Landers v. Andrews FronczekAppellate Court of Illinois · 1988
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.