Weiss v. Weiss
Supreme Court of Connecticut
1DissentPalmer, J.
I disagree with the majority’s conclusion that the plaintiff, Claudia Weiss, is barred by the doctrine of res judicata from litigating her claim in the present case because she “could have” litigated the meaning of the term “personal injury cases,” which is contained in the parties’ marital dissolution agreement, in the parties’ prior dissolution action but failed to do so. In so concluding, the majority misapplies the doctrine of res judicata and, as a result, reaches a result that is both contrary to settled law and manifestly unfair to the plaintiff. It also is quite clear that the…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Sena v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1994
- Creech v. AddingtonTennessee Supreme Court · 2009
- Jackson v. R. G. Whipple, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
- Dowling v. Finley Associates, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1999
- Commissioner of Environmental Protection v. Connecticut Building Wrecking Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.