Legal Opinion
Young v. Staman
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided November 29, 1940No. 6179PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HAMITER, Justice.
The controversy presented by this appeal is between plaintiff, L. Frank Young, and third opponent, the Arkansas Louisiana Gas Company.
The suit was commenced on August 13, 1939, by the said L. Frank Young for the purpose of obtaining a partition by licitation of the Northeast Quarter of Section 8, Township 16 North, Range 9 West, Bien-ville Parish, Louisiana, with improvements thereon, in which he owned an undivided interest. Impleaded as defendants and duly cited were his co-owners.
As no appearances were made by the defendants there was judgment on confirmation of default…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Spence v. LucasSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1915
- Liles v. BarnhartSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1922
- Amerada Petroleum Corporation v. ReeseSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1940
- Paulsen v. ReineckeSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1935
- Bickham v. PittsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1936
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Fullilove v. US Casualty Company of New YorkLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1961
- Bostick v. Intern. Minerals & Chemical Corp.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1978
- Amerada Petroleum Corporation v. MurphySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1943
- Bridgeman & Conway v. Korner Realty Co., Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1981
- Broussard Bros., Inc. v. Louisiana Insurance Guaranty Ass'nLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1988
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.