Paulsen v. Reinecke
Supreme Court of Louisiana
1Opinion of the Court
In May, 1933, plaintiff brought suit against his wife for divorce under the provisions of Act No. 31 of 1932 on the ground that they had been living separate and apart for a period of four years or more. The wife filed answer, admitting that she and her husband had lived separate and apart continuously for more than four years. She alleged that neither their separation nor their living apart was due to any fault of hers and that, in case the court should grant her husband a divorce, she should be allowed permanent alimony in the sum of $100 per month, and she prayed accordingly.
On June 18,…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Cassard v. TracySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1900
- Stallings v. StallingsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1933
- Hurry v. HurrySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1917
- North v. NorthSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1927
- Landry v. GraceSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1929
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- State v. Standard Oil Co. of LouisianaSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1937
- Shreveport Long Leaf Lumber Co. v. WilsonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1940
- General Motors Acceptance Corp. v. AnzelmoSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1953
- Siebert v. SiebertOregon Supreme Court · 1948
- Manuel v. Carolina Casualty Insurance CompanyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1961
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.