State of Minnesota v. Joshua Dwight Liebl
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SMITH, JOHN, Judge. *
We affirm the district court’s order suppressing evidence and dismissing criminal charges against respondent, because law enforcement’s installation and monitoring of a global positioning system mobile tracking device on respondent’s vehicle was an unreasonable search requiring suppression of the resulting evidence on which evidence the charges were based.
FACTS
On September 24, 2014, Minnesota Department of Natural Resources Conservation Officer Ed Picht submitted to the issuing court a signed and sworn application requesting judicial authorization, pursuant to…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- United States v. LeonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- United States v. VentrescaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- United States v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
- Davis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- Riley v. Cal. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2014
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- People v. Jason Robert LopezColorado Court of Appeals · 2022