Legal Opinion · Dissent

Shapiro v. Shapiro

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided July 29, 1997No. 123, Sept. Term, 1995Published

1DissentEldridge, Judge

The majority’s interpretation of Maryland Code (1984, 1991 Repl.Vol.), § 8-103 of the Family Law Article, contradicts the plain language of the statute and presents numerous problems. Furthermore, the majority’s interpretation is inconsistent with the history and legislative policy concerning judicial modification of alimony and spousal support agreements.(1)

Section 8-103 of the Family Law Article states as follows:

“ § 8-103. Modification of deed, agreement, or settlement.
*668“(a) Provision concerning children.—The court may modify any provision of a deed, agreement, or settlement with respect to…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Rose v. Fox Pool Corp.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1994
  2. Emerson v. EmersonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1913
  3. Fraternal Order of Police, Montgomery County Lodge No. 35 v. MehrlingCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1996
  4. Bailer v. Erie Insurance ExchangeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1997
  5. United States v. StreidelCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1993

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API