Legal Opinion
Sutter v. Gamel
California Court of Appeal
Decided December 7, 1962No. Civ. 20373PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DEVINE, J.—
Judgment was entered for defendants following an order sustaining demurrer to plaintiff’s first amended complaint, referred to herein simply as the complaint.
Plaintiff was given leave to amend, but did not do so within the time allowed, and upon motion, the court entered judgment dismissing the action. From this judgment plaintiff appeals.
The complaint alleges that plaintiff was at all relevant times a licensed real estate broker, and that defendants employed him and authorized him to procure a contract to sell certain real estate to defendants as prospective purchasers. It alleges…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Hartman Ranch Co. v. Associated Oil Co.California Supreme Court · 1937
- Silvers v. GrossmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
- City & County of San Francisco v. Western Air Lines, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1962
- Herzog v. BlattCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
- Calhoun v. DownsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Residents of Beverly Glen, Inc. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973
- Gonzales v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
- Wint v. Fidelity & Casualty Co.California Supreme Court · 1973
- Hilltop Properties, Inc. v. StateCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
- San Bernardino Valley Water Development Co. v. San Bernardino Valley Municipal Water DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.