Legal Opinion
People v. Hundal
California Court of Appeal
Decided November 25, 2008No. C055057, C055128PublishedCited by 5 opinions
[CERTIFIED FOR PARTIAL PUBLICATION*]
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BUTZ, J.
Defendant Kanwaljit Hundal was found guilty by a jury of six counts of committing lewd acts on his daughter, M., when she was 10 years old. (Pen. Code, § 288, subd. (a).) He was sentenced to a total of six years in state prison.
Defendant appeals, contending the trial court erred in excluding certain evidence and in denying his motion for a continuance. He also raises ineffective assistance of counsel. In the unpublished portion of the opinion, we shall affirm the judgment against defendant (see pt. I., post).
In a consolidated matter, Deputy District Attorney Claire Van Vuren…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- People v. Hacker Emporium, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1971
- People v. MuhammadCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
- Seykora v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
- Estate of MaronCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
- Korea Exchange Bank v. Myung Hui YangCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988
3Cited by5 opinions
- People v. WhitusAppellate Division of the Superior Court of California · 2012
- American Express Bank FSB v. Singh CA4/2California Court of Appeal · 2020
- People v. Cubit CA2/7California Court of Appeal · 2021
- People v. EdwardsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2023
- People v. Kareem A.California Court of Appeal · 2020