Legal Opinion
George v. US Bank
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided April 1, 2025No. Civil Action No. 2024-1598Published
1Opinion of the Court
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA GAYLE GEORGE, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 24-cv-1598 (JMC) US BANK, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION This civil action commenced on May 31, 2024, when Gayle George filed a “Bill Quia Timet: TO QUIET TITLE, REMOVE CLOUD, AND PREVENT IRREPARABLE HARM FROM AN UNCONSCIONABLE CONTRACT,” which the Court construes as a civil complaint. ECF 1. George since has filed an amended complaint, ECF 3, and second amended complaint, ECF 6. Because it appeared that Plaintiff’s goal is the reversal of unfavorable rulings of the Superior Court of…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- District of Columbia Court of Appeals v. FeldmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Rooker v. Fidelity Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Exxon Mobil Corp. v. Saudi Basic Industries Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Johnson v. De GrandySupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Lance v. DennisSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.