Legal Opinion
Jacobs v. Mostow
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided January 5, 2010PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*576The appeal from the intermediate order must be dismissed because the right of direct appeal therefrom terminated with the entry of judgment in the action (see Matter of Aho, 39 NY2d 241, 248 [1976]). The issues raised on appeal from the order are brought up for review and have been considered on appeal from the judgment (see CPLR 5501 [a] [1]).
The Supreme Court properly dismissed the complaint insofar as asserted against Arthur Riegel, the hearing officer at the plaintiff’s disciplinary hearing, inasmuch as “arbitrators are immune from liability for acts performed in their arbitral capacity”…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- In re AhoNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
- Gramatan Home Investors Corp. v. LopezNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
- Waterman v. Transport Workers' Union Local 100District Court, S.D. New York · 1998
- Andre Waterman v. Transport Workers' Union Local 100, Malcolm Goldstein and O'donnel, Schwartz, Glanstein & RosenCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999
- Indemnity Insurance Co. of North America v. MandellAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Siskin v. CassarAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
- Riccio v. Genworth Fin.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2020
- Pinkesz Mutual Holdings, LLC v. PinkeszAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016