Legal Opinion

Saunders v. Thut

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided March 28, 1914PublishedCited by 17 opinions

Appeal from Gray County Court; Siler ¡Faulkner, Judge. Action by Henry Thut, Jr., against George H. Saunders. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtHendricks, J.

This suit was instituted by tbe appellee, Henry Tbut, Jr., against George H. Saunders, appellant, to recover tbe sum of $200 for commission, by virtue of certain agency for sale of about 350 bead of cattle at a reasonable commission of 25 cents per bead, and tbe leasing of 10 sections of grass for tbe reasonable commission of 5 cents per acre. Upon appeal from tbe justice court to tbe county court of Gray county, the trial resulted in a verdict and judgment in favor of Tbut against Saunders for $100, and interest.

Every assignment of error in appellant’s brief is either tbe presentation of a…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Mutual Life Ins. Ass'n of Donley County v. RhoderickCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1914
  2. Quanah, A. & P. Ry. Co. v. GallowayCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1914
  3. Ross v. MoskowitzTexas Supreme Court · 1907
  4. Roberds v. LaneyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1914
  5. Luhn v. FordtranCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1909

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Needham v. CooneyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1915
  2. Stephenville, N. & S. T. Ry. Co. v. WheatCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1914
  3. Ross v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1914
  4. Stolaroff v. CampbellCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1929
  5. McNabb v. WoolfolkCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1922

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API