Legal Opinion

Ross v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided October 21, 1914No. 3247PublishedCited by 14 opinions

The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the Court

HARPER. Judge.

—Appellant was convicted of manslaughter and his punishment assessed at four years confinement in the penitentiary.

The Assistant Attorney General has filed a motion to strike from the record the bills of exception because not filed within the time allowed by law. The statute gives thirty daj's after adjournment of court in which to prepare and file bills of exception, and if more time is desired application must be made to the trial judge, who may grant or refuse such permission. In this case no application was made for additional time, and the court granted none, as shown by…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Heath v. HuffhinesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1914
  2. Gulf, T. & W. Ry. Co. v. CulverCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1914
  3. Ford Motor Co. v. FreemanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1914
  4. Johnson v. Hoover & LyonsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1914
  5. Saunders v. ThutCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1914

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Mooney v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1915
  2. Galan v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1915
  3. Vinson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1915
  4. Johnson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1957
  5. Rogers v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1983

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API