Legal Opinion

Gray v. Brown & Sehler Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided March 27, 1918No. Docket No. 183PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Error to Kent ;• Brown, J. Case by Thomas Gray, administrator of the estate of Morton B. Jameson, deceased, against Brown & Sehler Company for the negligent killing of plaintiffs intestate. Judgment for defendant on a directed verdict. Plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtFellows, J.

This action at law is brought under the “Death Act” to recover damages for the negligent killing of a workman who met his death by the falling of the walls of defendant’s plant, which had been destroyed by fire. The same accident occasioned the case of Opitz v. Hoertz, 194 Mich. 626, which came to this court on certiorari to the industrial accident board. In that case the question of liability for compensation was not disputed, the contested question being which defendant was liable. In the instant case plaintiff seeks to recover damages under a declaration counting on defendant’s negligence.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Opitz v. HoertzMichigan Supreme Court · 1917
  2. Waters v. GuileCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1916

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Smith v. Port Huron Gas & Electric Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1922
  2. Jordan v. CA Roberts CompanyMichigan Supreme Court · 1967
  3. Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railroad v. ParkerIndiana Supreme Court · 1921
  4. Grand Rapids Trust Co. v. Petersen Beverage Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1922
  5. Brabon v. Gladwin Light & Power Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1918

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API