Legal Opinion
Sharpensteen v. State
Supreme Court of Arkansas
Decided October 26, 1953No. 4751PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJ. Seaborn Holt, J.
On a jury trial, appellants were found guilty of violating the provisions of § 67-717, Ark. Stats., 1947 (Acts 1943, No. 232, § 1, p. 486), which provides :
“It shall be unlawful for any person in this State to secure any goods, wares, and merchandise, credit, or anything of value by means of a check or draft drawn upon any bank or institution outside of the State of Arkansas when said check or draft shall be dishonored or payment refused on account of the giver of such draft or check not having sufficient funds on deposit in said bank to pay said check or draft”.
Section 67-718: “Any person…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Casey v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1890
3Cited by5 opinions
- Porter v. GastonDistrict Court, E.D. Arkansas · 1978
- Ridenhour v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1983
- Opinion No., Arkansas Attorney General Reports1986
- Opinion No., Arkansas Attorney General Reports2000
- Opinion No., Arkansas Attorney General Reports1997