Legal Opinion

Opinion No.

Arkansas Attorney General Reports

Decided August 14, 2000Published

1Opinion of the Court

The Honorable Doyle Webb State Senator P.O. Box 1998 Benton, Arkansas 72015-1998

Dear Senator Webb:

This is in response to your request for an opinion on the following question:

Is it proper1 for a prosecuting attorney's office to handle a worthless check for utility services as a criminal "hot check" pursuant to Arkansas Code Annotated §§ 5-37-301 et seq.?

RESPONSE

It is my opinion that the answer to this question will depend upon the particular facts surrounding the "utility service." The most important consideration may be whether the check in question could be characterized as payment for a…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Ridenhour v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1983
  2. Sharpensteen v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1953

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API