Legal Opinion
ARAOYE v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided October 31, 2022No. 2:19-cv-00719Unknown
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA SAMUEL O. ARAOYE, CIVIL ACTION Plaintiff, v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, NO. 19-719 Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION Plaintiff Samuel Araoye, who is black, brings suit against Defendant City of Philadelphia claiming racial discrimination in the course of his employment by the City in violation of 42 U.S.C. § 1981. Araoye and the City have both moved for summary judgment pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56. For the reasons that follow, the City’s Motion shall be granted, and Araoye’s shall be denied. FACTUAL…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- City of Canton v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Board of the County Commissioners of Bryan County v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.