Legal Opinion
State v. Jemal M.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided January 31, 2012PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*962The evidence was legally sufficient to support the jury’s verdict since there was a valid line of reasoning by which the jury concluded that the appellant suffers from a mental abnormality, as that term is defined in Mental Hygiene Law § 10.03 (i) (see Matter of State of New York v Anonymous, 82 AD3d 1250, 1251 [2011]; Matter of State of New York v Derrick B., 68 AD3d 1124, 1126 [2009]). Moreover, the verdict that the appellant suffered from a mental abnormality was supported by a fair interpretation of the evidence and, thus, was not contrary to the weight of the evidence (see Matter of…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- State v. Derrick B.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- State v. AnonymousAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- State v. Andre L.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
3Cited by16 opinions
- State v. Raul L.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
- State v. Alfredo M.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- Matter of State of New York v. Abdul A.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
- State v. Robert B.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- Matter of State of New York v. Clyde J.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.