Pacific Bell Telephone Co. v. California Public Utilities Commission
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
BEA, Circuit Judge:
This case involves the balance the Telecommunications Act of 1996 (“the Act”) strikes between providing newer competitors access to previously monopolistic telecommunications markets, on the one hand, and encouraging and protecting infrastruc ture investments of older, incumbent telecommunications providers on the other. We must interpret two provisions of the Act that impose requirements on older, incumbent local exchange carriers (“incumbent LECs”) — like appellant AT & T — to lease certain components of their existing infrastructure to rival newer, competitive carriers…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Auer v. RobbinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Verizon Communications Inc. v. Federal Communications CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Webb v. Smart Document Solutions, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- United States Telecom Association v. Federal Communications Commission and United States of America, Bell Atlantic Telephone Companies, IntervenorsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2004
- Covad Communications Co. v. Federal Communications CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2006
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Pacific Bell Telephone Co. v. California Public Utilities CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- League to Save Lake Tahoe v. Tahoe Regional Planning AgencyDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2010
- WESTERN RADIO SERVICES CO. v. Qwest Corp.District Court, D. Oregon · 2010