Legal Opinion

Cedeno v. Moran Hauling

Court of Appeals of Mississippi

Decided April 25, 2000No. 1999-WC-00057-COAPublished

1Opinion of the Court

SOUTHWICK, P.J.,

for the Court.

¶ 1. The claimant alleged that he suffered an injury to his back in the course of his employment. It was uncontroverted that the claimant had a back problem. Its source was the issue. The Commission found that substantial evidence supported that his injuries were not job related. On appeal the claimant, who is a Cuban native, alleges that his difficulty with speaking English explains why coworkers and supervisors were unaware of his injury. Accordingly, he alleges that the evidence was sufficient. We conclude that the Commission was aware of the language…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Metal Trims Industries, Inc. v. StovallMississippi Supreme Court · 1990
  2. United States v. Ignacio Antonio Zayas-MoralesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1982
  3. United Methodist Senior Services v. IceCourt of Appeals of Mississippi · 1999
  4. Pruteanu v. Electro Core, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1993
  5. GARCIA-MIR Et Al. v. SMITH, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE UNITED STATES, Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API