Legal Opinion
Laflam v. Hillman
District Court, W.D. Washington
Decided July 9, 2025No. 2:25-cv-01039Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 9 10 ADRIENNE LAFLAM, CASE NO. 2:25-cv-01039-LK 11 Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING MOTION TO 12 v. AMEND JUDGMENT AND EMERGENCY MOTION FOR 13 MARK HILLMAN et al., PARTIAL STAY OF STATE COURT PROCEEDINGS 14 Defendants. 15 16 This matter comes before the Court on Plaintiff Adrienne LaFlam’s Rule 59(e) motion to 17 amend the judgment entered against her. Dkt. No. 9. Ms. LaFlam also moved for an emergency 18 partial stay of the state court proceedings pending the Court’s review of her Rule 59(e) motion. 19 Dkt. No.…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Middlesex County Ethics Committee v. Garden State Bar Ass'nSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- New Orleans Public Service, Inc. v. Council of City of New OrleansSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Sprint Commc'ns, Inc. v. JacobsSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
- Gibson v. BerryhillSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.