Avondale Mills v. Abbott Bros.
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the CourtThomas, J.
The trial was before the court without a jury and on evidence given ore tenus. The judgment was for plaintiff.
The evidence fails to show that, when defendant purchased the cotton from a third person, it had any knowledge, or facts calling for inquiry, of plaintiff’s mortgage lien. The mortgagor was not connected with the sale, having delivered the cotton to the agent of the bank, who sold the same and credited the proceeds to the debt of the mortgagor to the bank.
A mortgage, to be constructive notice as to third persons, must so describe the property that such persons, from the description…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Mayer & Co. v. Taylor & Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1881
- Pinckard v. CasselsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1915
- Windham & Co. v. Stephenson & AlexanderSupreme Court of Alabama · 1908
- Woods v. RoseSupreme Court of Alabama · 1902
- Truss v. HarveySupreme Court of Alabama · 1898
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Stewart v. ClemensSupreme Court of Alabama · 1929
- Abernathy v. WorthySupreme Court of Alabama · 1930
- Deloney v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1961
- Sims v. United Auto Supply Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1930
- Dutton v. GibsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1930
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.