Legal Opinion
T/F SYSTEMS, INC. v. Malt
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided April 24, 2002No. 4D01-196, 4D01-917PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
814 So.2d 511 (2002)
T/F SYSTEMS, INC., and T/F Purifiner, Inc., Appellants,
v.
Robert C. MALT, Appellee.
Nos. 4D01-196, 4D01-917.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
April 24, 2002.
Gary E. Susser of Law Office of Gary E. Susser, Boynton Beach, for appellants.
Richard S. Tolbert, West Palm Beach, for appellee.
GROSS, J.
The main issue in this case concerns the procedures a trial court must follow when it invokes its inherent authority to award attorney's fees against a party for bad faith conduct. The procedures described in the recent case of Moakley v. Smallwood, 27 Fla. L. Weekly…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Fischer v. KnuckSupreme Court of Florida · 1986
- Moakley v. SmallwoodSupreme Court of Florida · 2002
- Bitterman v. BittermanSupreme Court of Florida · 1998
- Bane v. BaneSupreme Court of Florida · 2000
- HIP Health Plan of Florida, Inc. v. GriffinDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2000
3Cited by10 opinions
- Bennett v. BergesDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2010
- Allegheny Cas. Co. v. Roche Surety, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2004
- Bank of New York Mellon v. MestreDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2015
- Goldman v. Estate of GoldmanDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2015
- Bavelis v. Doukas (In re Bavelis)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Ohio · 2017
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.