Legal Opinion

In re the Arbitration between Motor Vehicle Accident Indemnification Corp. & Walter

New York Supreme Court

Decided April 17, 1961PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFrank A. Gtjlotta, J.

This application by MVAIC to vacate a demand for arbitration served by the respondent, Edgar Walter, will be treated as a motion for a stay under section 1458 of the Civil Practice Act which uses the latter term, although if the stay is permanent it may have the effect of a vacatur.

It is asserted that Walter, although he was himself the possessor of a liability insurance policy at the time of the accident on October 20,1959, is not an “ insured person ” under section 601 of the Insurance Law but a ‘ ‘ qualified person ” because his policy contained no uninsured motor vehicle indorsement and…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Cappiello v. Motor Vehicle Accident Indemnification Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1964
  2. Jones v. Motor Vehicle Accident Indemnification Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1967
  3. Krouner v. Motor Vehicle Accident Indemnification Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1964

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API