Legal Opinion
Liduina Estremera v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided March 27, 2006No. 05-2278PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FLAUM, Chief Judge.
Plaintiff-Appellant Liduina Estremera (“Estremera”) owned a grocery store in Milwaukee. One of the clerks in her store violated Food Stamp Program regulations by selling ineligible items to customers. The Department of Agriculture, Food and Nutrition Services (“FNS” or “Agency”) permanently disqualified Estremera’s store from participating in the Food Stamp Program. Soon after, Estremera sold the store to Sousa Investment, LLC (“Sousa Investment”). At this time, FNS assessed a $66,000 civil monetary penalty against Estremera, pursuant to 7 C.F.R. § 278.6(f)(2). This…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- John F. Belom v. National Futures Association and Joy JuCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2002
- United States v. Edwin E. DackCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1984
- Maria A. Warren D/B/A Warren's Grocery v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1991
- United States v. Sheila BrittonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2002
- Thomas Brooks, Plaintiff/counterdefendant-Appellant v. United States of America, Defendant/counterplaintiff-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1995
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Irobe v. US Dept. of AgricultureCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2018
- General Auto Service Station v. City of ChicagoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2008
- Andy's Restaurant & Lounge, Inc. v. City of GaryCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2006
- Fells v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2010
- Clark v. County of TulareDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2010
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.